|
|
ArgDub
Full Member
Karma: +60/-1
 Offline
Posts: 202
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: March 26, 2011, 05:40:30 AM »
|
|
|
Also works for a 06A032032PL
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
L1011
Newbie
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 13
|
|
« Reply #2 on: March 31, 2011, 11:43:05 AM »
|
|
|
Thank you Spen.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #3 on: March 31, 2011, 03:46:06 PM »
|
|
|
the xdf will probably crash tunerpro if you open the large mlhfm map, but the data is in there if you want to swap mafs.
Spen, if you add a hack to automatically swap axes if one is >512 and the other isn't, tunerpro won't puke on it  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
torch
Newbie
Karma: +2/-0
Offline
Posts: 5
|
|
« Reply #4 on: April 05, 2011, 11:38:27 AM »
|
|
|
Thanks spen.
I have a question. Are you doing anything special with tuner-pro to display the tables properly? I am having a hell of a time understanding my teleprompter on these maps. Here is one example, I open the driver desired lambda and I get crazy graphs (at least it looks that way to me). Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Matt
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Gonzo
|
|
« Reply #5 on: July 13, 2011, 01:20:29 PM »
|
|
|
Ori link is not working so here it is
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: July 13, 2011, 01:27:04 PM by Gonzo »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
vwaudiguy
|
|
« Reply #6 on: July 25, 2011, 11:19:09 PM »
|
|
|
Did anyone have an answer to Torch's question? I seem to get strange values in the x-axis particularly.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"If you have a chinese turbo, that you are worried is going to blow up when you floor it, then LOL."
|
|
|
torch
Newbie
Karma: +2/-0
Offline
Posts: 5
|
|
« Reply #7 on: July 28, 2011, 09:41:31 AM »
|
|
|
Did anyone have an answer to Torch's question? I seem to get strange values in the x-axis particularly.
Try re-downloading the files and update TunerPro. I just did both and I have what appear to be the appropriate graphs and values. I did seem to lose a lot of options that I had before though (in my list view from my previous post) now the Parameter tree looks exactly like Spen's. I am currently using TunerPro 5.00.7686.00. Give it a shot and see if it is a version issue. Matt |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
amd is the best
|
|
« Reply #8 on: November 08, 2012, 11:51:02 PM »
|
|
|
Also works for a 06A032032PL
Thanks
Do you mean 06A 906032PL? Sorry to bump and old thread... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
2012 Golf TDI
2001 Audi A4 2.8 30v Supercharged
1991 Audi 200 20v
|
|
|
dnenov7
Jr. Member
Karma: +0/-1
Offline
Posts: 38
|
|
« Reply #9 on: April 30, 2013, 01:06:03 PM »
|
|
|
How I can get the XDF file ? tnx
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
vwaudiguy
|
|
« Reply #10 on: May 19, 2014, 01:18:14 PM »
|
|
|
Try re-downloading the files and update TunerPro. I just did both and I have what appear to be the appropriate graphs and values. I did seem to lose a lot of options that I had before though (in my list view from my previous post) now the Parameter tree looks exactly like Spen's. I am currently using TunerPro 5.00.7686.00. Give it a shot and see if it is a version issue.
Matt
Tried that, and everything seems fine now except for the labeling of the load values. I'm just looking at KFZW for instance...X axis (should be load?)...Actual values look ok, just the table seems misrepresented. Any suggestions? |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: May 19, 2014, 01:21:56 PM by vwaudiguy »
|
Logged
|
"If you have a chinese turbo, that you are worried is going to blow up when you floor it, then LOL."
|
|
|
|
vwaudiguy
|
|
« Reply #11 on: May 19, 2014, 05:34:27 PM »
|
|
|
If I use this definition, and the original file, with a fresh TunerPro install, I get a lot of maps that have incorrect values in the axis. Is it just me? |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: May 21, 2014, 10:14:16 AM by vwaudiguy »
|
Logged
|
"If you have a chinese turbo, that you are worried is going to blow up when you floor it, then LOL."
|
|
|
smelly240
Full Member
Karma: +10/-0
Offline
Posts: 102
|
|
« Reply #12 on: May 21, 2014, 10:07:49 AM »
|
|
|
LAMFA RPM Displayed weird for me when i was using that file to compare to make an RN xdf - i edited the significant digits to make it viewable
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
vwaudiguy
|
|
« Reply #13 on: May 21, 2014, 10:17:53 AM »
|
|
|
LAMFA RPM Displayed weird for me when i was using that file to compare to make an RN xdf - i edited the significant digits to make it viewable
I'm pretty new to modifying definition files, only having added a few extra maps to existing ones I've found on the net. Could you give a general explanation of what I need to change under what circumstances? Also do you know why are different people seeing different things using the same xdf and ori file? It seems I've seen this in other threads..Like I said before all the data of the actual map looks correct, just the axis are not. Thanks for your response, btw. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"If you have a chinese turbo, that you are worried is going to blow up when you floor it, then LOL."
|
|
|
smelly240
Full Member
Karma: +10/-0
Offline
Posts: 102
|
|
« Reply #14 on: May 21, 2014, 12:12:02 PM »
|
|
|
this is the same file above just with the significant digits changed on a few items (i think - its been awhile since i looked at that xdf).
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
